Supreme Court dismiss the petition to hear the Ayodhya land dispute
सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने अयोध्या भूमि विवाद को सुनने के लिए याचिका खारिज कर दी
Supreme Court dismiss the petition to hear the Ayodhya land dispute
Supreme Court dismiss the petition to hear the Ayodhya land dispute
Supreme Court dismiss the petition to hear the Ayodhya land dispute daily basis an advocate filed the petition name Harinath Ram in view of inordinate delay in the inordinate delay of Ram janam bhumi matter.In This petition the Advocate said that there is imminent danger of public outburst and he also said that he has sent a huge concentration to the general public at large about the effectiveness of the justice delivery system by the apex court of the country the bench dismissed the PIL it also said that further order in the case will be passed by an appropriate bench on January 10.
''The previous bench of Supreme Court comprising CJI Deepak Mishra & Justice Ashok Bhushan and Justice Abdul Nazeer head on September 27 decided by 2:1 majority that there was no need to refer the matter to a larger bench.''
The reference request made by the senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan the counsel for the Sunni waqf board on the premises that the observation is the in the constitution bench judgement in Ismail Farooqui case that offering Namaz in Mosque you is not an essential feature of Islam required reconsideration.
CJI Mishra and Justice Bhushan had however opined that the said observation in Farooqui was not relevant in determining the title dispute of Babri Masjid.
.It had held that the observation in Farooqui were made in the context of deciding the issue whether a Mosque could claim immunity from land acquisition proceedings.
Abdul Nazeer had held that the observations in Farooqui case influenced the High Court decision in the title suit and hence required reconsideration by a larger bench
Court declining the plea for reference to larger bench and majority head fix the next date of hearing as October 29 after this bench of CJI Deepak Mishra had then turn down the plea after a dramatic session.
CJI Mishra and Justice Bhushan had however opined that the said observation in Farooqui was not relevant in determining the title dispute of Babri Masjid.
.It had held that the observation in Farooqui were made in the context of deciding the issue whether a Mosque could claim immunity from land acquisition proceedings.
Abdul Nazeer had held that the observations in Farooqui case influenced the High Court decision in the title suit and hence required reconsideration by a larger bench
Court declining the plea for reference to larger bench and majority head fix the next date of hearing as October 29 after this bench of CJI Deepak Mishra had then turn down the plea after a dramatic session.
.It had held that the observation in Farooqui were made in the context of deciding the issue whether a Mosque could claim immunity from land acquisition proceedings.
Abdul Nazeer had held that the observations in Farooqui case influenced the High Court decision in the title suit and hence required reconsideration by a larger bench
Court declining the plea for reference to larger bench and majority head fix the next date of hearing as October 29 after this bench of CJI Deepak Mishra had then turn down the plea after a dramatic session.
Supreme Court dismiss the petition to hear the Ayodhya land dispute
Supreme Court dismiss the petition to hear the Ayodhya land dispute
Reviewed by GAURAV SINGH
on
January 05, 2019
Rating:
Reviewed by GAURAV SINGH
on
January 05, 2019
Rating:
.png)
No comments: